OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] Rigged Aggregators?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

No.  That was not my point at all.  IMO, belief in God is a healthy belief.

It is not science.  It makes people happier and healthier.  It has 
no evidence for hypothesis and rigorous proof.  It needs none.  It 
should not masquerade as science to meet other objectives.   We 
can go offline or to our blogs if you want to pursue that discussion.

The point was that belief or superstition and fact get confused 
without rigor, and that we shouldn't overlook the distribution 
effects of the web.  We should use them well.   

I think the aggregator vendors have a raw nerve and this 
thread touches it.  That is bad because it means they 
will work unconsciously and possibly unwittingly to 
promote this by denial without factual refutation.  

The FTC Chair has announced that she believes the 
dataMegaMarts that do rely on aggregation are in 
need of regulation and soon.  That is a real issue. 
The better the positions and technologies are clarified, 
the better the resulting laws and regulations.


From: Jeff Rafter [mailto:lists@jeffrafter.com]

> Hmmm... I have to disagree with you, Bill.  I think we 
> will see more blogs like that, and just as 'intelligent 
> design' is making its way into school science classes, 
> more superstition will be presented as credible theories 
> because those capable of refuting them refuse to take 
> the time.

Is that the point? To equate the "Rigged aggregators" blog with belief 
in God is offensive.

Jeff Rafter


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS