[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Rich Salz wrote:
>Sorry if conflating HTTP and HTTP/REST bothered you. I guess I don't
>understand the differences all that well.
>
>I thought I understood, and answered your question.
>
> Q. HTTP is extensible, why can't you build what you need?
> A. Because I need shared state, and because every
> client operation ends up being a POST. The first
> seems impossible, and the second means the framework
> benefits are nil.
>
>Or am I still missing the point?
>
>(I hate it when the limitation of the medium mean that two ostensibly
>reasonable people end up getting all ticked off at each other.
>Perhaps we should talk on the phone?)
>
> /r$
>
>
>
http 1.1 has persistent connections for long transactions. won't that do
the job?
in fact soap relies on it....
rick
begin:vcard
fn:Rick Marshall
n:Marshall;Rick
email;internet:rjm@zenucom.com
tel;cell:+61 411 287 530
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
|
