Lists Home |
Date Index |
Rich Salz wrote:
>Sorry if conflating HTTP and HTTP/REST bothered you. I guess I don't
>understand the differences all that well.
>I thought I understood, and answered your question.
> Q. HTTP is extensible, why can't you build what you need?
> A. Because I need shared state, and because every
> client operation ends up being a POST. The first
> seems impossible, and the second means the framework
> benefits are nil.
>Or am I still missing the point?
>(I hate it when the limitation of the medium mean that two ostensibly
>reasonable people end up getting all ticked off at each other.
>Perhaps we should talk on the phone?)
http 1.1 has persistent connections for long transactions. won't that do
in fact soap relies on it....
tel;cell:+61 411 287 530