[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Subject: Re: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
- From: Jason Aaron Osgood <mrosgood@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 09:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=57TDZxZQ+U3AidEGQ/cgbAds/hYulginDVcnuHK6XQcnqXKytCefIe/L/dFc8b2gGyuMxVjxXlrzNcTkB+jVa8nsGtDiYOTqWtvQFtApyiFPrXo62o3BgOI/raVk98LItHWkDAkttJlMso5GXxPG0J5U9+YkGWlxhvZ5qbWB1/U= ;
- In-reply-to: 6667
Claude L. (Len) Bullard-
Congratulations! You've been honored with a Quote of the Day on Cafe
con Leche [1]. This time its about something called an "upper
ontology". I admit that I have no idea what that means. But it
certainly sounds cool!
Having just read your original message [2], I feel compelled to verify
that I followed the gist of your philosophy.
- Ontologies are tools. Tools can be useful. Tools work as designed.
Unless they don't. And sometimes a new use for a tool is discovered.
- Rules too can be useful. Except when they're not. Follow the rules.
Or not. You decide.
- Decision making can sometimes be automated. Which can get expensive.
Either way, be sure to get it right.
Did I miss anything?
Cheers, Jason Aaron Osgood / Seattle WA
[1] http://www.cafeconleche.org/
[2] Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200411/msg00183.html
zappini.blogspot.com
|
