Lists Home |
Date Index |
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 20:28 +0100, Paul Downey wrote:
> Looking at the registrations and reports we've received so far, we're
> going to have many of the right people in the room. If you do have a
> tale to tell part in then this is undoubtedly the forum to air it.
I do hope its a + and - debate, rather than listening to the
the ra-ra brigade. Recall the debate over the 'survey' recently
on this list?
> I'm in the process of putting together a tail of woe using
> implementations in particular those from Web services land.
> Like many, we've a significant investment in XML Schema, services,
> processes and tools which depend upon it. Much of the value of XML
> Schema is that so many people do depend upon it and are in the
> same 'boat', so making it work is in the best interests of many.
> On the other hand, there is always a lot to learn examining the
> alternatives, and I'm personally open to hearing people compare
> and contrast experiences of using XML Schema with Relax, RDF,
> Schematron, CAM, UBL, et al.
I'm more curious about this.
Would you go to your <name your opposition team/> home base,
and sound off about how good your <name your home team/> is?
Unless you like being stoned (some do), why bother?
Michael, what expectations, if any, do you have in this area?