xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?

Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
From: Micah Dubinko <micah@dubinko.info>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:29:58 -0700
Cc: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <1f2ed5cd05062508106a9d1305@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1f2ed5cd05062508106a9d1305@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Danny Ayers wrote:

>I was wondering if there were any other cases around where a spec
>avoided using something like RDF on religious grounds, then later
>crept back in exactly that direction.
>
You mean like Web Forms 2.0? -m

-- 
  Available for consulting. XForms, web forms, information overload.
  Micah Dubinko                           mailto:micah@dubinko.info
  Brain Attic, L.L.C.                        http://brainattic.info
  Yahoo IM: mdubinko                                +1 623 298 5172
  Learn XForms today: http://xformsinstitute.com
  BPM in plain english: http://bpmfocus.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
  - From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>

References:
- Reject then reinvent..?
  - From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Reject then reinvent..?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
Previous by thread: Reject then reinvent..?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread