xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?

Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Micah Dubinko <micah@dubinko.info>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:18:08 +0300
Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <42BD8686.4060306@dubinko.info>
References: <1f2ed5cd05062508106a9d1305@mail.gmail.com> <42BD8686.4060306@dubinko.info>

On Jun 25, 2005, at 19:29, Micah Dubinko wrote:

> Danny Ayers wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if there were any other cases around where a spec
>> avoided using something like RDF on religious grounds, then later
>> crept back in exactly that direction.
>>
> You mean like Web Forms 2.0? -m

The rationale for Web Forms 2.0 not being XForms is very pragmatic--not 
religious.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

References:
- Reject then reinvent..?
  - From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
  - From: Micah Dubinko <micah@dubinko.info>

Prev by Date: Mailing list for RELAX NG users
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread