xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?

Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:04:41 +1000
In-reply-to: <1f2ed5cd05062508106a9d1305@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1f2ed5cd05062508106a9d1305@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)

Danny Ayers wrote:

>I was wondering if there were any other cases around where a spec
>avoided using something like RDF on religious grounds, then later
>crept back in exactly that direction. (Or if anyone knows whatever
>happened to WinFS...)
>  
>
Surely Danny means "I was wondering if there were any other cases around 
where a spec

added specific elements over time as the pressure|demand for them become
unstoppable, rather than buying into YALA (Yet Another Layer of Abstraction)." 

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
  - From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>

References:
- Reject then reinvent..?
  - From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Reject then reinvent..?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread