[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Paul Downey wrote:
> Agreed, but so are processing instructions and DTDs, and yet some domains
> choose to exclude them, e.g.:
>
> http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08
> -24.html#Disallowed_Constructs
>
And I'm on record as saying that's a major mistake. But again you're
confusing different issues. restricting the syntactic constructs allowed
in a particular application has nothing to do with what constraints a
schema language can express on the structures of documents.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
|
