[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
* Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com> [2005-08-10 02:19]:
> On 8/9/05, Gerald Bauer <gerald.bauer@mac.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone on the list has any comments on the rising
> > Web 2.0 movement that seems gather all the momentum that plain old XML
> > once had.
>
>
> xml-dev regulars have written about it, pro, con, and mixed:
> http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=e8e3d501-0c1a-477d-9212-c7366020fa3d
>
> http://lesscode.org/2005/08/07/dont-take-your-memes-to-town
>
> Tim Bray's comment
> http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/08/04/Web-2.0 is my
> favorite so far " a lot of us are already on 3.0. .... But most
> times, the whole thing still feels like a shaky early beta to me."
>
> But what the heck ... There's a hype wave to surf, so folks are
> partying like it's 1998.
>
If you are looking to ride that wave, XML is surf board of
choice. Oh, my. That was awful.
At the core of Web 2.0 are permalinks, hyper-linking, and
syndication. Really, permalinks, are the core of the revolution,
it was hard to get anything done when people kept moving and
deleting data.
I think that as the dust starts to settle, XSLT is going to
become an important player in these applications.
My 2 cents. Thanks for the reading.
--
Alan Gutierrez - alan@engrm.com
- http://engrm.com/blogometer/index.html
- http://engrm.com/blogometer/rss.2.0.xml
|
