xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD

Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:05:44 -0700
Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JkuQhXOFxVyp9wauOdODWXiy1Wd0bl5s9hqwCMUddYWDKqxD6ujpI/ac+3Lwe1xlUPDfX+oUUsJju8sK7uM14dHbQYuZVmjqeobTdIJk0vBpcMg6Uw+HvCERqNGGxSslgJsAlUtbE/LHOYgS41Xs1ya/1uX6uPK6HcrHW2JvF5I=
In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10592FE27@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10592FE27@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

On 8/16/05, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com> wrote:

> The lack of existence of a formalism was not really a factor as far as I
> remember.

RELAX NG's foundation on hedge automata is (or at least used to be)
cited as a factor in its technical success.  I'm saying  "don't bother
with a formalism unless you're really building on it."

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread