[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
before anyone "throws the baby out with the bathwater", can i point out
that i use dtd's (internally - you can't see them) because i only care
that the element/attribute structure is correct in incoming messages.
the rest is handled by the downstream processors.
in this circumstance i'm not sure i want the added complexity of xsd.
rick
DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) wrote:
> Vladimir Gapeyev wrote:
>
>
>
>>In this regard, I'd also wonder how frequent it is that XML documents do
>>
>>
>not
>
>
>>contain any DOCTYPE declarations, but are neveretheless maintained as valid
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>w.r.t. to some external DTDs? (The same wonder applies to the other schema
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>languages, of course.)
>>
>>
>
>Good point. One of the main design decisions for RELAX NG was that
>hardcoding a pointer to a schema inside of a document isn't a good idea.
>There can be good reasons to make XML documents public without making their
>DTDs or schemas public, so public versions may have such pointers removed.
>
>Bob
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
>!DSPAM:4355468741991317416688!
>
>
>
begin:vcard
fn:Rick Marshall
n:Marshall;Rick
email;internet:rjm@zenucom.com
tel;cell:+61 411 287 530
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
|
