[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On 10/28/05, Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see how this would be vastly easier in Schematron, or another schema
> language that allows co-occurrence constraints?
http://www.oasis-open.org/cover/schemas.html#dsd
> Strictly speaking, Schematron is independent of / complementary to
> XSD, however. It seems like it would be easier to figure out how to
> get them to work usefully together than start the schema wars over
> again.
>
this is the tactic I usually take, as I am willing to use an imperfect
and unwieldy grammar-based language if I can augment it with a quick
and handy contextual constraints language (for want of a better term)
but in the outlined case there is no way that xml schema would provide
anything to matching the requirementsv (that I or any of the X;ML
Schema conversant people I work with can see).
|
