[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "ROR" <dev@rorweb.com>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Invitation to metadata dictionary wiki - meaningfuel.org
- From: "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:59:12 -0800
- Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Thread-index: AcYh8LRcLG5wdsZKSn23JtSao4/CLgAAHEeA
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Invitation to metadata dictionary wiki - meaningfuel.org
It looks like each topic is like a class or an object of some kind? And
then within the topic fields or attributes are specified?
I really wonder if wiki is a good sructure to use for modelling meta
data. If you want to have a meta data repository that people can
contribute to, I think you may need to provide more structure.
----->Nathan
.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:
||:.
Nathan Young
CDC Site Dev->Interface Development Team
A: ncy1717
E: natyoung@cisco.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ROR [mailto:dev@rorweb.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 12:46 PM
> To: Jonathan Robie
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Invitation to metadata dictionary wiki
> - meaningfuel.org
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Good questions! I think the best way to look at the meaningfuel wiki
> is as some sort of "natural selection metadata". Some terms will
> vanish after two weeks, other more adequate terms, will live forever.
> Similar terms (i.e. from different ontologies) will compete, and here
> too, only the most adequate ones will survive.
>
> From time to time we plan to produce a release of the dictionary,
> which will only contain those terms that have reached sufficient
> stability and maturity.
>
> -Dom
>
>
> > One of the things I want in a metadata dictionary is stability - I
> want
> > to make sure that the definitions don't change because someone is
> out
> > there editing them, or the definition I used when I created
> the data
> may
> > have changed by the time someone else tries to get the
> metadata. How
> do
> > you provide stability in a Wiki environment?
> >
> > Also, I imagine people will be adding metadata from different
> ontologies
> > that may define the same terms differently. Any thoughts on how to
> deal
> > with merged ontologies in a Wiki environment?
> >
>
>
> > ROR wrote:
> >
> > >The ROR project ( http://www.rorweb.com ) is happy to introduce
> > >Meaningfuel.org ( http://www.meaningfuel.org ).
> > >
> > >The Meaningfuel.org project is a metadata dictionary that anyone
> can
> > >edit (sort of a Wikipedia for metadata). Its goal is to build a
> > >coherent evolving metadata dictionary for describing anything, by
> > >combining new and existing object metadata.
> > >
> > >This is an experiment, maybe it will fail. But it sure would be
> nice
> > >to have such a dictionary available, shared by all metadata
> > >initiatives.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > One of the things I want in a metadata dictionary is stability - I
> want
> > to make sure that the definitions don't change because someone is
> out
> > there editing them, or the definition I used when I created
> the data
> may
> > have changed by the time someone else tries to get the
> metadata. How
> do
> > you provide stability in a Wiki environment?
> >
> > Also, I imagine people will be adding metadata from different
> ontologies
> > that may define the same terms differently. Any thoughts on how to
> deal
> > with merged ontologies in a Wiki environment?
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
|