[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] xml xsl web architecture
- From: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:46:25 -0600
- Cc: "Anthony Ettinger" <aettinger@sdsualumni.org>, ElektonikaMail@tetro.net, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=izBuyauuxwWtG6X7QoiEtjuMCbn0iFDvrjeXjr6gH7u/cMZymQSyO54Dv61wrmFT6orA843LcyeLIQi1EpJcFjmjN2ta2x95i9hN0g3rUSgQn9Z5MVbNNb62Lzc/IIhrK/cIu/4wP/1d9RXK6xa6U+M89lxX5x2Pyo07bGUbmFk=
- In-reply-to: <43ff589c.4a7c3705.2e00.ffffd2d9SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com>
- References: <cc159a4a0602240944y896718fh709bc602048e97ff@mail.gmail.com> <43ff589c.4a7c3705.2e00.ffffd2d9SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com>
On 2/24/06, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
>
> > XSLT is a Turing complete language. By using it as your template
> > language you not only force everyone who designs for your site to
> > learn XSLT
>
> I think you're assuming you understand what you mean by a "template
> language", and you're assuming a particular model of web site development.
> My understanding of a template language is that you have a small number of
> people writing templates and a much larger number of people writing content.
>
Perhaps so. However, IIRC, in the original post part of the issue was
to make sure it was easy to map the "templating language" back to HTML
(<para> to <p> was the example given). To me that sounds like a
language aimed at the content side of the shop, otherwise, why is it
even an issue?
--
Peter Hunsberger
|
