Lists Home |
Date Index |
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Handling of PIs (was RE: [xml-dev] Choosing a target name...)
- From: Tatu Saloranta <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=prkuLhu3r9wGXMQ+3vBCZLh1xOeHojdcON6Xzw98sPRWfbIvQ4qG7DJly0Q+FExjJbibq1Yq7lX97d3sVVOEh10h/D84egGLqL2JthmFUdTlj/UUVULfnMFp2onex1gPPAEl2wwDnsJXP60s1d8ZDTu2I2aCzB5KsQP/4vbqzqA= ;
- In-reply-to: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D90849BA@US-MAIL.ingrnet.com>
--- "Bullard, Claude L (Len)"
> As to PIs, the fact that so many XML processors
> don't handle
> them says the XML specification designers' job was
I'm curious: are you thinking in general terms of XML
processing applications, or strictly about XML
processing tools (parsers, xslt/xquery tools)? I
thought that latter must handle PIs (whereas support
for comments was more optional), and at least
regarding parsers, they must be passed to handling
That obviously doesn't help with folks who re-define
what they think XML should mean (Soap, Xmpp) and omit
pieces they don't like.
-+ Tatu +-
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around