[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> But if you apply "object oriented" at the level of IT systems in
> the large,
> I believe that what you end up with is 100% equivalent to a service
> oriented
> architecture.
I'd say that service oriented architecture is more akin to a
component oriented architecture than an object oriented
architecture. The services integrated in the architecture are more
independent from one another and from the distributed application
into which they are integrated than a typical object in an object-
oriented application.
Dave Scott
On May 11, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Michael Kay wrote:
>>
>> Yes, object oriented is a great example (not to denegrate the
>> others either).
>
> But if you apply "object oriented" at the level of IT systems in
> the large,
> I believe that what you end up with is 100% equivalent to a service
> oriented
> architecture.
>
> Or could someone correct me? If I bumped into a service-oriented IT
> system
> in one bank on one side of the street, and an object-oriented IT
> system in
> another bank on the other side of the street, how would I tell
> which was
> which (other than by the choice of jargon on the Powerpoint slides)?
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
|
