[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On 5/11/06, juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com
<juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> Sorry to say this, but i sincerely have not time for reply stupid
> questions and trivialities.
Considering we took the time to respond to your points with some
civility you might try the same. Otherwise, why bother posting here
at all if you don't have the time to respond to us?
>
> No I have time for multiple explanations of stuff already explained,
> misunderstanding about why i cited Tim, et cetera.
Then why post at all? Clearly you are not making yourself understood!
> It also find interesting that anyone claim that a model with id and idref
> works for i am saying...
Can you explain why this is so?
> but still more interesting is the suggestion on "spell checker". That
> offers a clear "tip" on class of debate some of you are waiting.
We expect intelligent debate with posts that we can actually read
instead of having to guess on content and meaning.
> Good look! I will continue using a model for metadata generalized from one
> presented in last extreme markup conference.
>
> Just all one need.
If you want to play with the other kids in the sand box you need to be
nice to them. If you want to go sulk in the corner by yourself you
are welcome to do so. Just don't expect us to take any interest in
what you are doing...
--
Peter Hunsberger
|
