[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I vote xpath, or realistically due to needs - subset of xpath, which
would be the defined as absolute paths to elements and attributes
only.
Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen
On 5/12/06, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> wrote:
> Fraser Goffin said:
> > I was kinda hoping that JNVDL was going to do a bit more for me (like
> > providing an aggregated view of all of the validation errors from all
> > of the validators called, in a standard vocabulary (maybe even
> > allowing me to define what that vocabulary should be in some way) -
> > and, if I want it, the results for each namespace individually).
>
> I think the WG would be happy to consider adding a standard message
> reporting format, if someone contributed it. One thing holding us back is
> the desire to have running code, but I guess this is a quite well known
> issue.
>
> What would be great is if XML-DEVers could cobble together something, for
> example a set of requirements or a draft. Would you prefer the messages be
> given in terms of line numbers or XPaths?
>
> Schematron has a standard reporting format already:
> http://www.schematron.com/iso/P20.html
>
> > When
> > I think of COTS tooling I don't normally expect to write half of the
> > implementation myself ;-).
>
> Standards very often on specify half the necessary picture: XML & SGML for
> example.
>
> Cheers
> Rick Jelliffe
> Member WG1/SC34/JTC1
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
|
