[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Mac OSes up to 9 had a 'resource fork' in each file containing codes
indicating the creator and the type of data. This became a separate,
hidden file with Mac OSX on unix....
Always thought the original version was better..
Bob
On 15 Jun 2006, at 08:55, Michael Kay wrote:
>> Having spent some time following this perma-thread - it seems
>> to me that if I was a designing an OS from scratch I would
>> ditch the file extensions (in MS, VMS, etc) and use MIME
>> types mapped to OS functions as part of the i-node or
>> directory structure.
>
> I am sure that anyone designing an operating system from scratch
> would make
> the file system strongly typed, with much more scope for holding and
> retaining metadata relating to the content of files - but I would
> hope that
> they would do better than using MIME types, which are a pretty crude
> mechanism. For example, how does a MIME type capture which version
> of Word
> is needed to open a file?
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
|