[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] SGML complexity
- From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- To: "juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com" <juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:30:40 +0530
I feel, the list at the site is biased towards XSLT. XSLT should be
among 1st 25 I feel.
Among 1st 50 languages, the presence of "SAS, D, MATLAB, Logo,
Natural, Maple" cannot be above XSLT.
This is my view. I would like to see some discussion about this here.
On 9/4/06, juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com
<juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>
> About XSLT, it is interesting to take a look to September TPC index
>
> [http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm]
>
> XSLT popularity is less than a 0.069%
>
>
> Juan R.
>
> Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
http://gandhimukul.tripod.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]