XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Xlink Isn't Dead

Hiya,

On 9/22/06, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
> It's by no means extinct but it has a specialized habitat. For example it's
> heavily used in XBRL.

Also, the XML exchange format for Topic Maps (XTM) uses XLink for
pretty much any href.

> I've never understood the point myself. You can call your XML elements and
> attributes anything you like, why can't you do the same for your
> relationships?

I think it was an attempt at trying to sway good honest XML folks into
the dark alleys of semantic data modelling, because if it's an W3C XML
standard, everyone will use it, right? *whistle*


Alex
-- 
"Ultimately, all things are known because you want to believe you know."
                                                         - Frank Herbert
__ http://shelter.nu/ __________________________________________________


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS