RE: [xml-dev] Xlink Isn't Dead

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
To: "'Alexander Johannesen'" <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:46:45 -0500

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=171

You don't have to disbelieve.  You have to critically question requirements
to determine objectives.

len


From: Alexander Johannesen [mailto:alexander.johannesen@gmail.com] 

I think it was an attempt at trying to sway good honest XML folks into
the dark alleys of semantic data modelling, because if it's an W3C XML
standard, everyone will use it, right? *whistle*

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Xlink Isn't Dead
  - From: "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]