[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Xlink Isn't Dead
- From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- To: "'Ben Trafford'" <ben@prodigal.ca>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:49:52 -0500
Why the choice of the term "styling"? Is it distinguishable from
"rendering"?
"Styles are what data and cultures go into and out of." Dr. C.F. Goldfarb
len
From: Ben Trafford [mailto:ben@prodigal.ca]
In an ideal world, a lot of XLink would've gone into the
styling languages. But we weren't in an ideal world. That doesn't
render the work invalid; the ideas behind XLink are sound, they're
just in the wrong place, i.e. the document.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]