XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?

I’m sure you’re correct, however the error I get from Jing is this:

 

C:\ > java -jar \xml\jing-20030619\bin\jing.jar test.rng

C:\ > Test.rng:28:43: error: recursive inclusion of URL "file:/C:/[…]/Test.rng"

 

I now wonder: if all patterns are defined inside a containing grammar, could one except the container from a contained definition?  That way, all definitions would be excluded automatically when new ones were added to the container. Something I’ll try later…

 


From: Radu Cernuta [mailto:radu.cernuta@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 1:56 AM
To: Jeff Lowery
Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?

 

Sorry, I've overlooked the <optional> element. Rule 4.12 comes first in this case and adds a <group>, then 7.15. The basic idea stays the same: you cannot have several roots in an XML document.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS