[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML)
- From: Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:00:01 +0100
On 2/20/07, Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net> wrote:
> TEI says:
[...]
> A different model is at work here, and not one which fits the HTML-spawned
> page metaphor without a force-fit. The page metaphor was already archaic
> and web 2.0 heartily demonstrates that it is running out of steam as a force
> for innovation. In fact, web 2.0 as the interactive web is just a repeat of
> everything we have seen since the days of Englebart and Sutherland, just
> slower and harder to build.
The Patch 2.0 has been applied, and the web has been upgraded.
"Web 2.0" patchnotes:
- Web not flexible enough. Webpages become obsolete and take time
and money to update. Wiki software and forums are useful to fix that.
- Not enough form widgets. Javascript able for textbox for SSN
numbers, credit cards numbers, textbox for emails, etc.
- Bad search options. Google and the tags systems are usefull to fix that
- Brain dead interactivity of CGI apps. Web apps used to test empty
input forms on the server, and return with a red message "You have to
fill all textbox, dude!". That is horrible annoying. Ajax fix that
(but use CGI internally, in a invisible way).
- Boring, repetitive webpages. CSS fix that.
Know bugs: this web patch is know to add a few problems:
- Usability lost
- Slower webpages/CPU consuming webpages
- It need 7 techs to do a single thing (html, js, css, http,
json/xml, php, sql).
- Etc
Please wait while the real Web 2.0 is released by WC3. The marketed
as "Web 2.0" was a patch from 3th party people :DDD
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]