[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language- good or bad for the marketplace?
- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:41:36 +0200
Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> Up till this date, grammar-based and rule-based languages have been
> kept separate:
>
> Grammar-based Languages: XML Schema, Relax NG, DTD
>
> Rule-based Languages: Schematron, RuleML
Not completely. For more then year you can use NVDL to validate document
against both grammar and rule-based schemas at the same time.
Anyway, I'm glad to see xs:assertion in WXS. I have only two concerns:
- xs:assert uses probably too restricted subset of XPath
- Will be WXS 1.1 widely deployed in foreseeable future given the
investments spent by big companies on WXS 1.0 infrastructure?
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
OpenPGP digital signature
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]