OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound

You can still use a XSD to validate an instance if that XSD doesn't
declare any target namespace. For example :-

<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

<xs:element name="Root">
            <xs:element name="firstChild" type="xs:string"/>
            <xs:element name="firstSibling" type="xs:integer"/>


you can determine that this instance in not schema valid :-

<Root xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
	<firstSibling>this should be an integer to be valid</firstSibling>


On 13/12/2007, Nassar, Anthony <ANassar@hpti.com> wrote:
> I thank everyone for their responses. Perhaps this bears out Dr. Kay's claim, but I'm actually more baffled than ever. If the NUnit test-results.xsd schema specifies *no* namespace, then the types it declares are in *no* namespace, is that right? How does a schema-aware parser use them, if at all? Does it simply fake it (i.e., if you were foolish enough to declare types in the non-namespace, I guess I'll have to bail you out)?
> My more immediate question, which I might need to answer for myself, is simply, is NUnit's schema just "wrong"?

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS