XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Convention versus standard

> My experience is that an intelligent programmer using their own common sense
> will usually produce much more helpful variable names than a programmer who
> is blindly following rules defined by some corporate style police.

Yeah, I was trying to indicate that in a pithy manner by the
'hopefully achievable' part. As coding guidelines or (since this is
xml-dev) naming and design rules are bureaucratic you end up with
names that are  as intelligent as a bureaucracy can make them. If, as
is often the case, better names can be achieved by breaking the style
policies then this should be done. Maybe there is another category
between best practice and convention, or maybe the style policing is
best practice while intelligence is best situation?

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS