[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Type substitution vs. element substitution (akasubstitution groups)
- From: Farrukh Najmi <farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com>
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:50:07 -0500
Michael Kay wrote:
>> On XSLT support... Am I correct that element substitution
>> will not work well unless XSLT processor is schema aware but
>> type substitution will?
>>
>
> No neither will work unless the processor is schema aware.
>
According to the following link under the title "*Scalable Processing"*:
<http://www.xfront.com/VariableContentContainers.html#method3>
A non-schema-aware XSLT processor can process a variable container
element better if it is using type substitution when compared to element
substitution.
I also note that in the final analysis the bets practice does not
recommend using element substitution:
<http://www.xfront.com/VariableContentContainers.html#BestPractice>
>
>> AFIK, there are *NO* open source, royalty free schema aware
>> XSLT processors available.
>>
>
> True, it's a common problem. No-one round here is offering free taxi rides
> either.
>
True enough for free taxi rides, but many including yourself are
offering free non-schema-aware processors. That was my point.
--
Regards,
Farrukh Najmi
Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]