OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0

>> I think the XML 2.0 spec should have a 'Compatibility' section in it that
>> says if you want your XML 2.0 document to be valid XML 1.0, then take note
>> of the following ... .  One of the things it would mention is comments.
> That's certainly worth considering. Perhaps there should be two
> levels? a basic level with no XML declaration that is XML 1.0
> compatible, and a level with<?xml version='2.0'>  that is not?
I started trying to work out use cases for backwards compatibility (old 
documents, new tools / old tools / new documents), and realized I don't 
have enough experience (or patience?) to propose anything definitive or 
thoroughly considered.  Still I feel that the success of this whole 
enterprise will very much hinge on getting the nuances of the 
compatibility decisions just right, so smart people: please think deeply 
about this!

-Mike Sokolov

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS