Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0

[David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>]

On 06/12/2010 14:36, Dave Pawson wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:50:57 +0000

>
> On which basis the only suggested improvement is to allow -- within
> comments.
>
> worth a try for simplification.
>
> thanks.
>

Whether or not it's worth a try depends on what the ground rules are.
If there is a rule that every well formed xmlnext document is well 
formed xml 1.0, then this is out of scope. A significant number of 
people (but clearly not all) in recent threads have wanted that. See for 
example Jirka here:

http://cafe.elharo.com/xml/xml-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-549222

David



________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________