RE: [xml-dev] Pete's blend for XMLlite

["David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>]

Good idea on picking a name, but alas, from the great discussions this week,
I doubt just picking a name will mean were talking about the same thing.
There seems to my eye more opinions about the intent/goals/meaning  for "xxx
XML" then people.


----------------------------------------
David A. Lee
dlee@calldei.com
http://www.xmlsh.org


-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Pawson [mailto:davep@dpawson.co.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 7:59 AM
To: Pete Cordell
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Pete's blend for XMLlite


On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:19:58 -0000
"Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> wrote:

> 
> It's at:
> 
> http://codalogic.com/xmllite/xmllite.html


Can we get this naming issue out of the way, to reduce confusion?
For my 2 cents worth XML 2.0 is a non-starter, due respect to W3C.

Simple XML,
XMLLite 
 What else?

Has anyone access to a 'survey' type of site so we can vote on one of
the ones suggested?

At least we could then be sure we're talking about the same thing?




-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php