XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Status of MicroXML?

On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:10:13 -0700
Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Am I wrong in this, or has this thread changed to 'lets invent
> > a new schema language'
> >
> 
> To be fair, that's a different thread.  As I read that thread, it's
> more about figuring out what approach to schema for MicroXML will
> offer a worthy level of simplicity.  Yes some are calling for
> something new, but just as many are saying "Just use RNG, Schematron,
> Examplotron, etc."

I think relax NG for uxml would be relatively easy to teach?
Perhaps Schematron if you wanted to check namespace usage
in uxml?



-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS