[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Status of MicroXML?
- From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
- To: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:31:21 +0000
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:10:13 -0700
Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Am I wrong in this, or has this thread changed to 'lets invent
> > a new schema language'
> >
>
> To be fair, that's a different thread. As I read that thread, it's
> more about figuring out what approach to schema for MicroXML will
> offer a worthy level of simplicity. Yes some are calling for
> something new, but just as many are saying "Just use RNG, Schematron,
> Examplotron, etc."
I think relax NG for uxml would be relatively easy to teach?
Perhaps Schematron if you wanted to check namespace usage
in uxml?
--
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]