Re: [xml-dev] Micro XSD for Micro XML?

[Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>]

If someone writes a parser for their MicroXML can they do so
treating the XML as just text and still be able to include some
simple validation against schemas written in these micro
schema formats/languages?
----
Stephen D Green



On 24 December 2010 11:48, Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is a schema, so I can use it today,
>> with nxml-mode/emacs for editing,
>> with Jing for validating.
>>
>> Not sure what more I'd need?
>>
>
> Mmm. Only Java? Only emacs? Nothing for .NET, C, Javascript, etc?
>
> I guess the test will be, would someone using MicroXML be able to
> write their own validating parser based on MicroRNG? Or would they
> easily find a suitable one for their platform/programming language?
> e.g. how long before a future version of MSXML or .NET supports it?
> xerces? Does using MSXML or xerces mean I'm not likely to stick with
> MicroXML anyway? Presumably it is more likely to appeal to someone
> writing C++ or the like for a mobile platform or jQuery on a website,
> so how would they easily be able to implement MicroRNG or some
> other MicroSchema mini language?
>
> ----
> Stephen D Green
>
>
>
> On 24 December 2010 11:02, Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:16:05 +0000
>> Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  So how 'easy' would it be to include this in
>>> validating MicroXML parsers (if there ever are such things)? Perhaps
>>> easier than having to implement something like XSD which isn't valid
>>> as XSD; perhaps less risky anyway.
>>
>> This is a schema, so I can use it today,
>> with nxml-mode/emacs for editing,
>> with Jing for validating.
>>
>> Not sure what more I'd need?
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> regards
>>
>> --
>> Dave Pawson
>> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
>> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>>
>