Its "trivial" yes, but its not "right" IMHO :)
Nor is it necessarily efficient.
I wouldn't bet a case of beer that for a large
value of attribute x that
points = fn:tokenize( $x , "[ ,]")
is more efficient then for a node x with point
children
points = $x/point
I can imagine in some processors for some size of
$x one or the other is more efficient.
But is that a reason to make the design decision
for a (potentially) widely used standard schema ?
This is a serious question, not rhetorical.
