[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
functional databases noodling ...
- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:57:28 +0100
every year at XML Prague, Michael Kay either via his talks or
questions makes a single comment that spawns a few hundred hours of
research on my part ... this year was his minor mention of 'functional
databases' ... which sent me scrambling.
a few thoughts immediately came to mind:
* how valid is it to say 'xquery is a functional
programming/query language' ? I think 3.0 makes this statement true
it then a few more followed:
* is it possible that we could rename xml databases (who have
xquery) into 'functional database' especially if they employ XQuery
3.0
* what other characteristics make a functional databases (as in
immutable functional data structures) and what context could xml
technologies be applicable
* what comprises a functional data structure and does xml model them well ?
* just as there is an impedance mismatch between OO and
relational databases are we creating new impedance mismatches by not
using functional data structures ?
* does anyone on the list has experience with pure functional
databases in existence
So as you can see not entirely well formed thoughts and I still need
to do quite a bit more research to come up to speed with previous work
in this domain but interesting ... thank you Dr. Kay.
Jim Fuller
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]