XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] newline/form feed valid as attribute value?

On 2 July 2012 23:11, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 22:06, Mike Sokolov wrote:
>>
>> Can anybody explain to me why the comment subexpression wouldn't just
>> swallow an entire document like this:
>
>
> you are right, it would (assuming the regexp dialect being used has the
> usual longest match semantic).

The regex syntax used is the same as in egrep(1). ~(E) in ksh93
selects egrep mode, ~(G) grep mode, ~(F) fgrep/plain strings, ~(P)
pcre and so on.

>
> ([^><]+)            # xml text
>
> isn't right either as > is allowed in xml text.

Do you have an example xml fragment for that? I can't imagine that
<atag>></atag> can be valid. libxml2 at least chokes on that.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS