[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Micro-XML is now a proposed W3C group
- From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
- To: Len Bullard <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:01:23 +0000
Len,
We would appreciate any help, but especially that of the category of individuals
you mention.
As Uche was too kind to mention that I forgot to include a link, please, sign up here:
http://www.w3.org/community/xmlhypermedia/
I am waiting for a bit of activity in the MicroXML Community Group, so that I
can imitate that.
Thanks,
Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Len Bullard [mailto:Len.Bullard@ses-i.com]
> Sent: July 16, 2012 11:55
> To: Rushforth, Peter
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Micro-XML is now a proposed W3C group
>
> James and John know their stuff down to the metal and beyond to atoms.
> It's in the best hands.
>
> As for the hypermedia affordance ideas, if Rick Jeliffe is
> available and willing, he is quite capable and knows where
> the rocks beneath the surface are. That's a much tougher
> problem as it comes down to a common data model.
>
> len
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rushforth, Peter [mailto:Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 10:36 AM
> To: Len Bullard
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Micro-XML is now a proposed W3C group
>
> Hi Len,
>
> I read you loud and clear Len :-). However, Community Groups
> are created for "anyone to socialize their ideas for the Web
> at the W3C for possible future standardization".
>
> To that end, I think some higher-level discussion around
> MicroXML goals might not be a bad thing, so that we don't go
> off in the wrong direction on assumptions.
>
> In any case, I am certainly in agreement with you: good luck!
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]