On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Andrew Welch <
andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 April 2013 07:37, Ihe Onwuka <
ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:04 AM, George Cristian Bina
>> <
george@oxygenxml.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Ihe,
>>>
>>> People asked for a Schematron example that you think cannot be written as an
>>> XPath only test then they wanted to show you the equivalent XPath for that.
>>>
>>> Basically, in Schematron you have
>>>
>>> rule/@context = XPath expression
>>> assert/@test = XPath expression
>>>
>>> these can be written in XPath 2.0 as
>>>
>>> //(context)/test
>>>
>>> where context is the rule/@context expression and test is the assert/@test
>>> expression.
>>>
>>> So, the challenge will be to come up with a Schematron example for which
>>> someone cannot write an XPath equivalent. If you cannot provide such an
>>> example then you should accept that they are equivalent, at least for your
>>> use cases.
>>>
>>
>> I am sorry I have no idea what that challenge has to do with what I
>> have been illustrating.
>
> You were trying to say my use of XPath/XQuery in unit tests was bad,
> and to use Schematron instead:
>
