XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] PLOS blog about relative merits of XML (JATS) and HTMLin workflows

On 06/10/2013 11:04 PM, Sheila M. Morrissey wrote:
[...]
> Her query If XML is being used as an interchange format only, what
> do we gain from moving the XML piece of the workflow any further
> upstream from final delivery?

The canonical answer is usually the ability to service multiple delivery
formats from a single master.

Plus the preservability of a plaintext self-describing file format (if
the document is regarded as worth preserving for posterity).

But publishers don't usually see either of these as a source of revenue.

///Peter


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS