[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] PLOS blog about relative merits of XML (JATS) and HTMLin workflows
- From: Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:43:37 +0100
On 06/10/2013 11:04 PM, Sheila M. Morrissey wrote:
[...]
> Her query If XML is being used as an interchange format only, what
> do we gain from moving the XML piece of the workflow any further
> upstream from final delivery?
The canonical answer is usually the ability to service multiple delivery
formats from a single master.
Plus the preservability of a plaintext self-describing file format (if
the document is regarded as worth preserving for posterity).
But publishers don't usually see either of these as a source of revenue.
///Peter
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]