XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Big Data and XML

[xml-dev] has been down for almost 4 days, and Arjun is the first to blat out opinions and discredit a hypothetical situation intended to help convey the concept of needed speed in XML processing.
 
What happened to take the OASIS list servers down for 4 days? Arjun, blat about that.

Brian
 
 
> From: arjun.ray@verizon.net
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 09:37:12 -0400
> Subject: [xml-dev] Big Data and XML
>
> [Repost: the xml-dev list manager swallowed the earlier version; in
> fact, the list seemed down for several days.]
>
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:53:21 -0400, I wrote:
>
> | Someone wants to blat out a terabyte of mostly unchanged data every
> | 15 minutes, in XML? This is demented.
>
> In fact, there is something very artificial - or perhaps, symptomatic
> of goldenhammeritis - in all the examples or use cases or scenarios of
> XML for "big data" that I've seen so far.
>
> This particular example is no different:
>
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 08:16:00 -0600, Brian Aberle <xmlboss@live.com>
> wrote:
>
> : Suppose you have a list of "foos". Suppose that list is very very
> : long. 1 Terabyte. Suppose that you get updated XML source of that
> : list every 15 minutes. In the huge list, [...]
>
> A list, as a unitary XML document? Thousands upon millions upon
> gajillions of "foos", all piled into a _single_ XML instance?
>
> For the love of mike, why?
>
> What was wrong with a _list_ of those gajillions of "foos", each an
> XML instance by itself (or in whatever format floats your boat)?
>
> You could then enrich that _list_ by having each item encapsulated
> with meta data - such as a unique id, payload size, etc - to optimize
> caching or whatever other high-speed, low-latency, humunous-throughput
> requirement you have.
>
> : some "foos" are new, some foos() have been updated.
>
> What about the ones that have been deleted, or expired, or otherwise
> bitbucketed?
>
> If this is state of the art in protocols for "big data", and why XML
> is touted as a "solution", I can't say that I'm impressed.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS