In passing, I would like to observe that the title of the W3C
Working Group being discussed is "XML Query Working Group" and the
charter of that WG speaks of developing a query language for XML. In
fact, the language developed by the WG is called "XQuery: An XML Query
Language". While the WG, and its participants, understand the
importance of JSON and have as a goal integration of support for
querying XML data along with JSON data, the name and charter of the WG
have not been changed to "JSON Query WG". JSONiq is a very good technology developed specifically to integrate thorough JSON support alongside the XML Query facilities in XQuery. However, as Mike Kay has stated several times, the goals of the XML Query WG were not identical to the goals of the group who designed JSONiq. Thus, given the primary focus of the XML Query WG and the goals of its participants, it is not surprising that the results of the WG's work differs from what the JSONiq developers might have hoped. Hope this helps, One of the morons On 5/13/2015 2:35 AM, Ihe Onwuka wrote:
-- ======================================================================== Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: +1.801.942.0144 Chair, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC32 and W3C XML Query WG Fax : +1.801.942.3345 Oracle Corporation Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com 1930 Viscounti Drive Alternate email: jim dot melton at acm dot org Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA Personal email: SheltieJim at xmission dot com ======================================================================== = Facts are facts. But any opinions expressed are the opinions = = only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody = = else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. = ======================================================================== |