I seriously thought about objecting
the use of Unicode as the document
character set. I even started to write
an email, but I didn’t send it.
I was also instructed to object the use
of non-ascii characters in tag names
in Japan. I once oked, but I didn't.
Regards,
Makoto
Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> writes:
> A huge benefit, brought by XML, was that with Unicode, it allowed
> [all natural languages] an equal playing field
Hear, hear. Those of you who were around in [Santa Clara, I think it
was?] when the box of red pre-prints of the 1st draft of XML was
distributed will remember that there was significant push-back on the
commitment to Unicode, along the lines of "you idiots, you've signed
your own death warrent, no-one will commit to doubling the size of
their documents just to accommodate people who should be using English
anyway". I exaggerate only slightly. All credit to Jon Bosak and the
rest of the editorial group for not giving in.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, Markup Systems Ltd.
Cavers Garden Farm, Denholm; by Hawick; TD9 8LN
+44 (0) 7866 471 388
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@markup.co.uk
URL: http://www.markup.co.uk/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
_______________________________________________________________________
XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
--
--
慶應義塾大学政策・メディア研究科特任教授
村田 真