dita-lightweight-dita

← back

46 messages · 11 threads

# Subject From Date
00000 MDITA "spec" and status Carlos Evia 2016-06-09 15:12
00001 Agenda for today Michael Priestley 2016-06-13 13:27
00002 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Agenda for today Mark Giffin 2016-06-13 14:08
00003 Report on multiple classes for MDITA headers Carlos Evia 2016-06-14 15:01
00004 Do we need multi-level specialization? Michael Priestley 2016-06-14 17:35
00005 Thoughts on a survey Michael Priestley 2016-06-20 20:12
00006 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey Carlos Evia 2016-06-21 00:48
00007 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey Michael Priestley 2016-06-21 17:29
00008 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey Michael Priestley 2016-06-27 00:43
00009 DITA and HTML5 Michael Priestley 2016-06-27 00:56
00010 Re: Do we need multi-level specialization? Michael Priestley 2016-06-27 00:59
00011 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] DITA and HTML5 Carlos Evia 2016-06-27 01:15
00012 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Re: Do we need multi-level specialization? Mark Giffin 2016-06-27 02:31
00013 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey Mark Giffin 2016-06-27 04:08
00014 First pass schema deducer code Mark Giffin 2016-06-27 05:31
00015 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] DITA and HTML5 Mark Giffin 2016-06-27 05:40
00016 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] DITA and HTML5 Don Day 2016-06-27 05:45
00017 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey Rahel Anne Bailie 2016-06-27 07:42
00018 Regrets for today, plus a few thoughts. Jan Benedictus 2016-06-27 13:32
00019 Agenda for today Michael Priestley 2016-06-27 14:15
00020 RE: [dita-lightweight-dita] Re: Do we need multi-level specialization? Scott Hudson 2016-06-27 14:18
00021 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] DITA and HTML5 Michael Priestley 2016-06-27 14:37
00022 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Regrets for today, plus a few thoughts. Michael Priestley 2016-06-27 14:38
00023 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] DITA and HTML5 Kristen James Eberlein 2016-06-27 14:51
00024 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey Rahel Anne Bailie 2016-06-28 17:34
00025 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey Noz Urbina 2016-06-28 17:45
00026 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey [email protected] 2016-06-28 18:34
00027 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey Carlos Evia 2016-06-28 18:54
00028 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey Rahel Anne Bailie 2016-06-29 06:53
00029 (Not so) silly question about acronym Carlos Evia 2016-06-29 16:34
00030 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] (Not so) silly question about acronym Don Day 2016-06-29 16:46
00031 RE: [dita-lightweight-dita] (Not so) silly question about acronym Scott Hudson 2016-06-29 16:50
00032 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] (Not so) silly question about acronym [email protected] 2016-06-29 17:14
00033 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] (Not so) silly question about acronym Mark Giffin 2016-06-29 17:14
00034 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] (Not so) silly question about acronym Carlos Evia 2016-06-29 17:20
00035 RE: [dita-lightweight-dita] (Not so) silly question about acronym Tom Magliery 2016-06-29 17:33
00036 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey Michael Priestley 2016-06-30 01:07
00037 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey Michael Priestley 2016-06-30 01:15
00038 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] (Not so) silly question about acronym Rahel Anne Bailie 2016-06-30 07:34
00039 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey [email protected] 2016-06-30 08:49
00040 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] (Not so) silly question about acronym Carlos Evia 2016-06-30 12:24
00041 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] (Not so) silly question about acronym Mark Giffin 2016-06-30 16:49
00042 First draft of survey Carlos Evia 2016-06-30 18:40
00043 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] (Not so) silly question about acronym Rahel Anne Bailie 2016-06-30 18:52
00044 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] First draft of survey Rahel Anne Bailie 2016-06-30 18:58
00045 Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] (Not so) silly question about acronym Michael Priestley 2016-07-01 01:26