| 00000 |
Add security considerations |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-03 16:28 |
| 00001 |
8.3.1 - why uncapitalized "should" on tablenames with spaces? |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-03 17:31 |
| 00002 |
Nit: 8.3.1 "in some situation" -> "in some situations" |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-03 17:36 |
| 00003 |
8.5.1 - exposed passwords are a security risk |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-03 17:49 |
| 00004 |
Date fields 6.2.1 -- what is "current date"? Don't you mean "lastedit" date? |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-03 21:03 |
| 00005 |
Page numbers are always numbers? |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-03 21:28 |
| 00006 |
Need more detailed definitions for formulas |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-04 04:20 |
| 00007 |
14.5.23 - should support odd-page and even-page, and breaking beforeand after |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-04 04:58 |
| 00008 |
custom-defined schemas |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-04 05:31 |
| 00009 |
Re: [office-comment] custom-defined schemas |
Gary Edwards
|
2004-10-04 08:01 |
| 00010 |
Public Comment |
[email protected]
|
2004-10-05 07:26 |
| 00011 |
Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use the namespace prefixes given. |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-05 09:36 |
| 00012 |
Suggest someone do a cross-comparison with Framemaker MIF |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-07 22:27 |
| 00013 |
Re: [office-comment] custom-defined schemas |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-08 03:34 |
| 00014 |
Guide words? |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-08 03:43 |
| 00015 |
How to handle MathCAD/Mathematica-like text? |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-08 03:52 |
| 00016 |
Re: [office-comment] Public Comment |
Michael Brauer
|
2004-10-25 07:46 |
| 00018 |
Re: [office-comment] 8.5.1 - exposed passwords are a security risk |
Michael Brauer
|
2004-10-25 07:46 |
| 00017 |
Re: [office-comment] Date fields 6.2.1 -- what is "current date"?Don't you mean "last edit" date? |
Michael Brauer
|
2004-10-25 07:46 |
| 00019 |
Re: [office-comment] 14.5.23 - should support odd-page and even-page,and breaking before and after |
Michael Brauer
|
2004-10-25 07:46 |
| 00020 |
Re: [office-comment] Public Comment |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-25 09:29 |
| 00021 |
Re: [office-comment] Public Comment |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-25 10:11 |
| 00022 |
Re: [office-comment] 8.3.1 - why uncapitalized "should" on tablenameswith spaces? |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-25 10:20 |
| 00023 |
Re: [office-comment] Nit: 8.3.1 "in some situation" ->"in some situations" |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-25 10:23 |
| 00024 |
Re: [office-comment] Public Comment |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-25 10:52 |
| 00025 |
Re: [office-comment] Need more detailed definitions for formulas |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-25 11:17 |
| 00026 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use thenamespace prefixes given. |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-25 14:53 |
| 00027 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use the namespace prefixes given. |
David Faure
|
2004-10-25 15:01 |
| 00028 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use thenamespace prefixes given. |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2004-10-25 15:24 |
| 00029 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use the namespace prefixes given. |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2004-10-25 15:53 |
| 00030 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use the namespace prefixes given. |
David Faure
|
2004-10-25 16:11 |
| 00031 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use thenamespace prefixes given. |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2004-10-25 19:16 |
| 00032 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use thenamespace prefixes given. |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2004-10-25 19:27 |
| 00033 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use the namespace prefixes given. |
David Faure
|
2004-10-25 21:22 |
| 00034 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use thenamespace prefixes given. |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-26 02:06 |
| 00035 |
Re: [office-comment] Need more detailed definitions for formulas |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-26 03:06 |
| 00036 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use thenamespace prefixes given. |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2004-10-26 03:12 |
| 00037 |
Eliminate "text-numbered-paragraph", and are that many differenttypes really needed? |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-26 04:57 |
| 00038 |
Inserting 'id's to improve "diffing". |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-26 05:04 |
| 00039 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use thenamespace prefixes given. |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-26 06:51 |
| 00040 |
Re: [office-comment] Section 1.5 - implementations SHOULD use thenamespace prefixes given. |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-26 07:18 |
| 00041 |
Re: [office-comment] Need more detailed definitions for formulas |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-26 07:33 |
| 00042 |
Re: [office-comment] Need more detailed definitions for formulas |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-26 17:40 |
| 00043 |
RE: [office-comment] Need more detailed definitions for formulas |
Scott Wiseman
|
2004-10-26 17:41 |
| 00044 |
Re: [office-comment] Need more detailed definitions for formulas |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-28 06:59 |
| 00045 |
Re: [office-comment] Eliminate "text-numbered-paragraph",and are that many different types really needed? |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2004-10-28 07:26 |
| 00046 |
Re: [office-comment] Need more detailed definitions for formulas |
David A. Wheeler
|
2004-10-29 04:00 |
| 00047 |
Public Comment |
[email protected]
|
2004-10-30 21:29 |
