Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: XML Dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 14:46:43 -0400
David Brownell wrote:
> - Validating Parsers
> - Nonvalidating Parsers that read external definitions
> - Nonvalidating Parsers that don't read those definitions
> Point being that as section 5.2 makes clear, some WF errors will
> not be reported by the third category of parser, but must be
> reported by the other two.
I think, however, that NVPs may read some external entities (the
DTD external subset, say) but not others (like the content of
external general entities).
> That'd be "SHALL NOT" ... but I think that a parser which
> has read the external DTD entities MUST report as a WF error
> such problems. See the XML specification in section 5.2, which
> is explicit that this is a WF error AND that it's not consistently
No, it means "MAY fail to" or "MAY or may not".
> > 7. An NVP MAY NOT signal an error if a reference is made to an
> > unparsed entity, if the entity was declared in some external entity.
> As above -- this is a "MUST" if the parser reads external entities.
> and a "MUST NOT" elsewhere.
Unless it reads some e.e.s but not others.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan firstname.lastname@example.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)