[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- To: XML Dev <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 11:10:48 -0400
James Clark wrote:
> The term "well-formed HTML" as used in section 1 of the XSL WD does not
> mean SGML that conforms to HTML 4.0. It means well-formed XML that uses
> element types and attributes from HTML.
Well and good. But "uses element types" etc. is vague: all element
types, or only some of them? It can't (straightforwardly) be all
of them, because SCRIPT and STYLE are CDATA elements, and so
have no XML equivalents.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
