[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Toby Speight <tms@ansa.co.uk>
- To: "XML developers' list" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: 14 Sep 1998 18:17:07 +0100
John> John Cowan <URL:mailto:cowan@locke.ccil.org>
0> In article <35F93D78.B8325124@locke.ccil.org>, John wrote:
John> James Clark wrote:
>> The term "well-formed HTML" as used in section 1 of the XSL WD does
>> not mean SGML that conforms to HTML 4.0. It means well-formed XML
>> that uses element types and attributes from HTML.
John> Well and good. But "uses element types" etc. is vague: all element
John> types, or only some of them? It can't (straightforwardly) be all
John> of them, because SCRIPT and STYLE are CDATA elements, and so have
John> no XML equivalents.
Whether element content is CDATA or #PCDATA is relevant only to a parser.
Once you have (for example) a grove representation, an application can't
tell the difference between the subtrees representing the two types of
element.
--
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
