Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "K.Kawaguchi" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Simon Hargreaves <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 21:40:51 +0900
> I would have thought layering a messaging protocol over existing email
> protocols, would be a bad idea. It would be better to have a service that
> could contain proccessing components based on the type of message going in
> e.g. the DTD. and also make it secure e.g. SSL from the start. The service
Well, you are right in the sense that such a full fledged system is
necessary. I agree.
But at the same time I personally think that SMTP/POP3 can still work
very well in many situations; especially for lightweight systems.
Or, is it only me who feel like this? If so, what am I missing?
Yet unsolved question is whether such a component already exists or