[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: "'XML Developers List'" <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 07:23:56 -0500
It becomes a speed trap in a one highway
town. It isn't an issue of a responsibility
to break it, but the lack of an alternate
route to avoid it.
We have a major problem. Our court systems
aren't technically sharp enough to process
these claims. A new breed of CS lawyer is
emerging as a result. We have to watch this
while the precedents are established, but
don't neglect keeping the press both digital
and print fully informed.
Len Bullard
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Gregg Reynolds [mailto:greynolds@greynolds.com]
But is BT's claim any more ridiculous than many other patently absurd claims
of a similar nature? E.g. Microsoft's stylesheet patent, Amazon's
one-click, etc. etc. In the face of such blatant legal stupidity (or is
"chicanery" more accurate?), does it not become the honest citizen's
responsibility to break the law?
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|